This paper is misleading, but for the reasons stated in the first 4 lines of the minute, and Bently
partly because it haves
in
out of count the small increase 21463 and 34483, and the further
item of about # 3,705
acc 2 of
205 on acc
the active allowances proposed in 27205.
The
reason?
given by Cammy Hastings
for not making these
recommendations in detail
see end of his report of Nov. 10, are
very unsatisfactory
delaying hope in
an
they practically
have vindicated
of the finality of these recommendations.
The bus Mary's officers referred to were wanted for the P.O. launch. They do not appear to have been appointed, as their salaries
16382
The
not on
the 1900 Estimates. The two extra clerks herein proposed are to be additional to and in relief of the three clerks who now receive allowances as
Mailing Officers,
and travel in turn from Southampton to Singapore and back
the mail
steamers. As to this sum 2254 - which
is patent for refusing this
part of the
proposals. Moreover, the
PMG's letter of 13 Nov is inadequate. without the two letters from the Harcourt
in sanction
Nov 10, it fails to point out that Mr. Chamberlain had assumed,
the increases of staff proposed in
that the Gov. had
satisfied itself that those increases were sufficient to put the Dept on a sound footing; that Mr. Chamberlain
regret the statement in the last para. of the PMG's letter of Nov 10 that the reason for not making these recommend-
ations last year was that he altogether doubted whether if any large increase
proposed, anything of staff and pay
would be granted, and say Chamberlain is not prepared to sanction further increases now
proposed unless the Gov.
can assure
him not only that they absolutely necessary for the efficient
conduct of the post office, but also that further increases of
staff will be proposed for
GW)26/
CPL27 27
atones
Officers, which are
not inclosed.
A.F.2011
Artiend. 2, forwarded
(a)--12435-2000-1-99
16196-2000-4-99
this paper is misleading, but for the reasons stated in the first 4 linis ofthe monte, and bently
partly because it haves
in
out of count the small increas 21463 and 34483, and the further
item of about # 3,705
acc 2 of
205 on acc
the active allowances proposed in 27205.
The
reason?
geen by Cammy Hastings
fo not making these
recommendations in ethil
see end of his repat of Nov. 10,- are
very unsatisfactory
detay ang hope in
an
they practicall
wt have vindulged
of the finality of these recommendations.
The bus Mari's officers affrared on were wanted for the P.0. launch. They do not abbean to have been abbonitid, as their salanès
16382
The
амя
not on
the 1900 Estimates. The two extra click herein protosed in tobe additional to and in relief of the three clerks who now receive allowances as
Maning Officers,
Hary
and travel in turn from sofford to singafore and buck
the mail
steamers. As to this su 2254 - which
patent for refusing this
affad.
part of the
proposals. Moreover, the
PMG's rehat of 13 Nor is inadequate. without the two letters from the Harne
in sanction
Nov 10, ? faint out that th. 526 Chamberlain had assumed,
the incueses of staff protored in
that the Sov. had
mis,
763822 2.1663
satisfied tunelf that those uncreams rufficial to but the Defte a sound footing; that ill Chamber-
wer
a
lami notices
regret the statement in the last her. of the Iff's letter of Now 10 that he reason fo not making these recommend -
fil ations last thil was that he atautore doubted whether if any large increase
hoposed, anything of staff and pay
that li
would be granted, and say Chamberlain is not prepared to Chambulo further increases nom
sanction
proposed unless the fo
ov.
Con assure
for the efficient
him not only that they absolutely necen an it
duct of the post office, ont also further increases of
Con
mo
that tota
maturg Def") will be staffin proposed for
شگر نیستا
GW) 26/
aft
CPL 27 27
atones
Officers, which are
not inclosed.
proced
A.F.2011
Artiend. 2, ? frwend
ал
profond on 2274 as to the letter of
And
އ
(a)--12435-2000-1-99
16196-2000-4-99
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.